data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f9ef/2f9ef2a6afbdba938e74a53890c7f96ffe8a8442" alt=""
Universally described as very much a hops-forward lager, I was expecting something along the lines of Brooklyn's, but it's a much more intense experience. There's little to no restraining malt -- just super-resinous earthy hops. I kept having to remind myself that it's a pilsner rather than a full-on English IPA. The thin texture and light fizz adds to the cask effect.
I'm not at all sure I like it. It's just too unbalanced, and has that metallic flavour I often find from English hops in large quantities, though the earthiness meant it went rather well with some mature and gritty Bellingham Blue cheese. Nevertheless, I think I'll be sticking with good old Brooklyn as my hoppy lager of choice.
'It's just too unbalanced' - you're totally right, BN. My wife and I got hold of some 77 Lager in our local offie and opened it with glee. The lack of balance throws the beer way off kilter. I see no discernable point in this being a pilsner - I can taste no lagery quality to it.
ReplyDeletePunk IPA is heavily hopped but is exceptionally well balanced.
it just isn't a pilsner, end of story, full stop.
ReplyDelete