Tetley's Golden Ale first, a 4%-er. It smelled a bit skunky, which wasn't a good start. The flavour was very decent, however: a mostly sweet and slightly spicy mix of golden syrup and Earl Grey tea, providing sugar, tannin and bergamot. It's fizzy, but not thin with it. Consumed ice cold it's very refreshing, and just complex enough to be worthwhile. Not a million miles from a quality Czech lager, actually. Yes it tastes very similar to plenty of other English golden ales, but then that's not something I drink very often. I was on board for the sequel.
That would be No. 3 Pale Ale. Pale ale trumps golden, right? Wrong. While this is similarly coloured, and only a little bit stronger, it's horribly dry, to the point of acrid. It's crackers: spun wheat or rye crackers, topped with sesame seeds and possibly sawdust. There's an even harsher finish, all musty and dusty, and even a little sour. Three sentences later I have to remind myself that they've called this a pale ale. There's no hop character, and no malt kindness either. A cruel beer, in short, and I doubt any dispense variant would save it.
Georgian Yorkshire, then, is a land of contrasts. Top notch golden ales and execrable pale ones. Tread carefully.
Georgian Yorkshire, then, is a land of contrasts. Top notch golden ales and execrable pale ones. Tread carefully.
I think the Golden Ale is brewed at Wolverhampton, although the No. 3 Pale Ale is from Leeds Brewery. I went to the press launch of the No.3 last year with the announcement that "Tetley's returns to Leeds". It was OK there, but examples I've had in the wild have been, as you say, unbalanced and unappealing.
ReplyDeleteCheers for the background. Good ol' Marstons.
ReplyDelete